One of many largest questions shaking up the blockchain business now’s whether or not profitable tasks ought to stay loyal to the Layer 1 (L1) blockchains or strike out on their very own and launch their very own native chains, a choice that might basically alter the economics of networks like Solana.
Solana, with its excessive pace and low fuel charges, has been on a meteoric rise over the previous few years. Its whole worth locked (TVL) has soared above $11 billion, largely fueled by the success of protocols like Jito, Jupiter, Raydium and different protocols. However right here’s the catch: all of this progress hinges on one factor—tasks staying put.
What occurs if probably the most worthwhile functions, those driving Solana’s memecoin frenzy and DeFi increase, resolve they not want the community and migrate to their very own chains? Might Solana’s financial mannequin unravel, its once-thriving income streams drying up as protocols transfer to seize extra worth for themselves?
So, is Solana—and, by extension, different L1s—constructed for the lengthy haul, or is the golden age of L1 dominance nearing its finish?
L1 blockchains have lengthy been the spine of crypto, however their continued existence has been partly due to the sheer exercise pushed by the protocols constructed on them. As an illustration, 5 protocols contribute 85% of Solana’s TVL.
Extra tasks are opting to interrupt free from L1 chains and set up their very own devoted blockchains, pushed by the promise of decrease prices, larger customization, and full governance autonomy. As a substitute of being confined to the foundations and limitations of a general-purpose L1, they’ll tailor their infrastructure, management transaction charges, and dictate governance insurance policies with out exterior interference.
Value effectivity is a significant component on this exodus. On an L1, community charges fluctuate wildly primarily based on demand, making transactions unpredictable and infrequently costly. For prime-frequency merchants and DeFi platforms, these prices can add up shortly. Sovereign chains permit tasks to set their very own financial fashions, making certain secure and predictable charges that profit each builders and customers.
Then there’s customization. Whereas L1s like Ethereum and Solana supply sturdy ecosystems, they drive protocols to adapt to predefined community buildings moderately than optimizing for his or her distinctive wants. A undertaking launching its personal blockchain positive aspects the liberty to tweak consensus mechanisms, block occasions, and transaction processing speeds—a bonus that may be game-changing for sectors like gaming, DeFi, and high-speed buying and selling.
However maybe probably the most compelling purpose for this migration is governance. Protocols constructed on an L1 stay on the mercy of that community’s core builders and governance choices. A sudden change in transaction charges, validator incentives, or block manufacturing mechanisms can disrupt their total operation. Shifting to a sovereign chain eliminates this threat, permitting tasks to make choices that align solely with their imaginative and prescient and group pursuits.
A number of high-profile tasks have already embraced this transition:
dYdX, a number one decentralized derivatives change, initially launched on Ethereum however later migrated to a Cosmos-based sovereign chain. The transfer allowed dYdX to optimize its infrastructure for high-speed buying and selling whereas gaining full management over governance and transaction prices.
Jupiter, Solana’s second-largest protocol by TVL at $2.814 billion, is at the moment debating whether or not to observe swimsuit, with proponents arguing {that a} devoted blockchain might improve efficiency and mitigate dangers tied to Solana’s community congestion or governance shifts.
Polygon, initially launched as an Ethereum Layer 2 (L2) scaling answer, has since expanded right into a multi-chain community. With the introduction of Polygon Supernets and the Polygon CDK (Chain Improvement Package), the undertaking is encouraging builders to construct application-specific chains that perform independently whereas nonetheless being interoperable with Ethereum.
DeFi protocols owe a lot of their success to the ecosystems that nurtured them, but the very nature of crypto encourages autonomy. The extra these tasks develop, the extra they query whether or not they should maintain paying lease to L1s once they might personal the land outright.
The attract of breaking free from Layer 1 (L1) blockchains is plain—decrease charges, full autonomy, and the flexibility to fine-tune infrastructure to suit a undertaking’s precise wants.
However is sovereignty actually the golden ticket it seems to be?
Stepping away from a longtime L1 is greater than only a technical improve; it’s a high-stakes leap that comes with critical trade-offs. Whereas some protocols dream of independence, historical past has proven that L1s supply a basis that’s extremely tough to switch.
One of many largest causes protocols thrive on L1s is liquidity. In DeFi, liquidity isn’t only a nice-to-have; it’s the lifeblood of the ecosystem. Ethereum, as an example, boasts over $60 billion in Whole Worth Locked (TVL)—a deep ocean of capital that only some blockchains can rival.
When a protocol launches on a significant L1, it immediately faucets right into a ready-made market of merchants, traders, and liquidity suppliers. However the second it decides emigrate to an impartial chain, issues get difficult.
Liquidity doesn’t simply observe innovation—it follows comfort. Convincing customers and liquidity suppliers to maneuver to a brand new, unproven community is not any straightforward feat. dYdX needed to supply vital incentives to lure customers to its new Cosmos-based chain. With out robust incentives, a undertaking dangers fragmenting its liquidity, creating skinny markets the place slippage will increase and buying and selling turns into much less environment friendly.
Then there’s safety. L1s like Ethereum and Solana have spent years battle-testing their networks, constructing sturdy validator participation and safe consensus mechanisms. A protocol that strikes to its personal chain should both recruit and keep its personal validator set or depend on a shared safety mannequin like Cosmos’ Interchain Safety. Neither choice is straightforward.
A weak validator set may be disastrous—living proof: Meter (MTRG), a smaller Layer 1 community suffered a $4.4 million exploit in February 2022 as a result of vulnerabilities in its bridge safety. Attackers exploited poor validator incentives, minted additional tokens, and drained the community’s liquidity. Many smaller chains have suffered related fates, struggling to determine the financial and technical safety wanted to stop assaults.
Past liquidity and safety, L1s present one other essential benefit: community results. The great thing about an ecosystem like Ethereum is its composability—protocols don’t function in isolation; they combine, stack, and construct on one another. A lending protocol can join seamlessly with a buying and selling platform, a yield aggregator, or a liquidity pool, creating an interconnected internet of monetary functions. That’s why tasks like Uniswap, Aave, and Curve proceed to thrive on Ethereum; they’re leveraging the collective energy of the ecosystem.
Then again, impartial chains should construct these connections from scratch. With out an lively developer group and established infrastructure, they threat changing into remoted islands in an ocean of blockchain networks.
Even when a protocol manages to copy all these options, one ultimate hurdle stays: person migration. Altering blockchains isn’t nearly decrease charges or technical enhancements—it’s about shifting person habits. Folks have a tendency to stay with what they know, and except there’s a compelling purpose to modify chains, they gained’t. Velocity, value financial savings, and scalability are nice promoting factors, however they is probably not sufficient to beat the inertia of a well-established L1 ecosystem.
On the finish of the day, protocol sovereignty appears like a daring step ahead, however it’s a raffle with no assured payoff. L1s supply extra than simply infrastructure; they supply safety, liquidity, and a thriving ecosystem that’s extremely tough to copy.
The continued debate over protocol sovereignty versus ecosystem dependency is just not new. It echoes previous discussions concerning the roles of Layer 1 , Layer 2 , and even the comparatively latest one about Layer 3 options in blockchain growth.
RELATED: Are Layer 2 Options Enhancing Ethereum-or Killing It?
Finally, the blockchain business is just not a zero-sum sport. Whether or not L1 chains thrive or fade will rely not simply on their potential to retain protocols, however on how successfully they adapt to new fashions of scalability, governance, and interoperability.
If historical past is any indication, the way forward for blockchain won’t be outlined by a single dominant method however by a dynamic steadiness between innovation, sovereignty, and community collaboration. L1s, L2s, and even application-specific chains can coexist, every fulfilling totally different wants.
So, will impartial chains actually redefine the blockchain panorama, or will they wrestle towards the gravitational pull of L1 ecosystems? The reply might form the way forward for DeFi—and all the blockchain business.
Interoperability presents a compelling center floor. As a substitute of shedding high-value protocols fully, L1s might pivot to changing into seamless bridges between impartial chains, facilitating liquidity circulate, governance coordination, and cross-chain composability. This transformation wouldn’t mark the tip of L1 relevance—it may very well be their subsequent nice evolution.
Simply because the web thrived by linking disparate networks moderately than retaining them siloed, blockchain’s future might lie in connectivity moderately than competitors. L1s that embrace this shift might safe their place not as walled gardens however because the highways enabling an interconnected, multi-chain world. The query isn’t whether or not L1s will survive—it’s whether or not they’ll adapt quick sufficient to stay on the centre of blockchain’s subsequent frontier.
Disclaimer: This piece is meant solely for informational functions and shouldn’t be thought of buying and selling or funding recommendation. Nothing herein must be construed as monetary, authorized, or tax recommendation. Buying and selling or investing in cryptocurrencies carries a substantial threat of monetary loss. All the time conduct due diligence.
If you want to learn extra articles like this, go to DeFi Planet and observe us on Twitter, LinkedIn, Fb, Instagram, and CoinMarketCap Group.
Take management of your crypto portfolio with MARKETS PRO, DeFi Planet’s suite of analytics instruments.”
