Binance-affiliated corporations have launched a high-profile authorized battle in opposition to stablecoin funds supplier RedotPay, accusing the agency and its co-founders of improperly diverting practically half one million Binance customers in violation of economic agreements. The lawsuit, filed in Hong Kong, seeks roughly $472.8 million in damages, marking one of the vital important authorized disputes to emerge within the quickly increasing crypto funds sector.
The case arrives at a pivotal second for RedotPay, which has been increasing aggressively within the stablecoin funds market whereas reportedly making ready for a possible U.S. preliminary public providing. Though Binance alleges that RedotPay constructed a part of its progress by exploiting entry to Binance Pay customers, the funds firm has firmly denied all accusations and says the litigation is not going to disrupt its operations.
Binance Associates Sue RedotPay Founders for $473 Million Over Person Diversion (Supply: X)
Binance claims RedotPay breached business agreements
Based on courtroom filings cited by Bloomberg, Binance associates Nest Buying and selling, DistributedTechnologies, and Chaintecs Consulting Singapore accuse RedotPay of violating contractual restrictions governing the usage of Binance Pay.
The plaintiffs allege that starting in March 2026, RedotPay enabled and inspired customers to fund RedotPay cost playing cards immediately by Binance Pay in methods explicitly prohibited below their partnership agreements. Binance argues that this follow successfully redirected prospects away from Binance’s personal ecosystem and towards RedotPay’s competing cost infrastructure.
The change estimates that greater than 470,000 Binance prospects migrated by this mechanism. Utilizing an estimated lifetime buyer worth of $925 per consumer, Binance calculated damages of practically $473 million.
Along with misplaced buyer worth, Binance alleges that roughly $304 million in Binance Pay consumer property flowed into the RedotPay ecosystem by the disputed funding mechanism, additional strengthening its declare that the corporate benefited financially from the alleged contractual violations.
Binance has declined to debate the specifics of the continuing litigation publicly however said that it intends to pursue all out there authorized avenues to guard its business pursuits.
Parallel lawsuits in Hong Kong and Singapore
The authorized battle extends past Hong Kong.
Alongside the first lawsuit, Binance affiliate Chaintecs Consulting Singapore has initiated associated authorized proceedings in Singapore in opposition to entities related to RedotPay and its co-founders, together with Gao Zhangpeng, Chan Wa Choi, and Yao Chao. A listening to within the Singapore case is reportedly scheduled to happen this week.
The coordinated litigation throughout a number of jurisdictions underscores how critically Binance seems to be treating the dispute, significantly given the worldwide nature of each corporations’ cost operations.
RedotPay rejects each allegation
RedotPay has responded by categorically denying Binance’s claims.
In an official assertion, the corporate stated it’s totally conscious of the authorized proceedings and intends to “vigorously defend” itself in opposition to what it describes as unfounded allegations.
The agency additionally emphasised that the lawsuits could have no impression on its day-to-day operations, reassuring prospects and enterprise companions that companies will proceed uninterrupted whereas the courts take into account the case.
Regardless of the authorized problem, RedotPay highlighted the continued progress of its enterprise. Based on the corporate, its world consumer base has expanded by greater than 33% over the previous six months, surpassing 8 million customers worldwide. It additionally reported roughly $180 million in annualized income and round $14 billion in annualized cost quantity, illustrating its speedy emergence as one of many largest stablecoin cost card suppliers globally.
A partnership that unraveled
The dispute stems from a business relationship that started in late 2023, when RedotPay built-in Binance Pay into its crypto cost card platform.
On the time, the collaboration allowed Binance Pay customers to switch funds immediately onto RedotPay-issued cost playing cards, making it simpler for purchasers to spend cryptocurrencies and stablecoins in on a regular basis transactions.
Nonetheless, Binance says the unique partnership rapidly encountered issues after it concluded that buyer funds had been getting used for actions outdoors the agreed framework. The preliminary settlement reportedly collapsed inside six months.
The businesses later negotiated a new settlement in March 2025, introducing stricter safeguards requiring Binance Pay property to stay totally segregated.
Underneath the revised association, Binance prospects might use Binance Pay on RedotPay just for particular functions, together with changing crypto into fiat foreign money, making in-app transfers, and buying RedotPay-branded merchandise. Direct funding of RedotPay cost playing cards remained expressly prohibited.
Based on Binance, additional violations had been found throughout a evaluate of cost companions, in the end main the change to terminate the partnership in April 2026.
IPO ambitions increase the stakes
The lawsuit arrives at a very delicate time for RedotPay.
The corporate has reportedly been exploring a U.S. IPO that would increase greater than $1 billion and worth the enterprise at over $4 billion, with main funding banks together with JPMorgan, Goldman Sachs, and Jefferies advising on the potential itemizing.
Bloomberg reported that Binance argues the alleged diversion of consumers immediately contributed to RedotPay’s company worth because it prepares for public markets. If confirmed in courtroom, the allegations might turn out to be a major difficulty for buyers evaluating the corporate’s progress trajectory and buyer acquisition practices.
A intently watched case for crypto funds
Past the monetary claims, the dispute highlights rising tensions surrounding partnerships between crypto exchanges and cost suppliers as stablecoin adoption accelerates worldwide.
Binance Pay has turn out to be an more and more essential element of Binance’s broader ecosystem, whereas RedotPay has positioned itself as one of many fastest-growing issuers of crypto-linked cost playing cards. The lawsuit subsequently raises broader questions on how buyer entry, cost integrations, and business restrictions must be ruled as digital asset cost networks turn out to be extra interconnected.
For now, each side stay firmly dedicated to defending their positions in courtroom. With proceedings underway in each Hong Kong and Singapore, the end result might affect not solely RedotPay’s enlargement plans and potential IPO, but in addition how future partnerships between crypto exchanges and cost corporations are structured throughout the trade.
